Hi Neal,
just in case i happen to work u somehow,
be sure I (87 years of age) am going to stick
to your proposal !
73 Heinz DK7UM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neal Campbell" <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@outlook.com>
Cc: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers
We could replace the 599 with RYRY to slow things down for the old
timers....
73
Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal LLC
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> wrote:
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:31:01 +0100, DK7UM wrote:
>
>Now seriously: I always thought ham-radio to
>be a hobby. If miliseconds count that much,
>is there still some enjoyment left, to get in touch
>with friends?? May I doubt it!
REPLY:
It's not so much that milliseconds count (although they do) but that
sending 599 is pointless with RTTY. I can see some argument for
sending a signal report on CW or SSB because it sets the tone and
rhythm for what follows, but RTTY doesn't need that.
73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|