RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] QRZ to QRV

To: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] QRZ to QRV
From: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:23:07 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Tom,
I really don't mind trying to learn the proper way to do it. I think some 
Q-signals spice things up a bit - it's certainly easy enough to Google q 
signals 
and see the meaning, for the unwary. I think common q-signals are part of the 
ham lingo. Using proper signals can avoid a lot of confusion - that's why 
formal 
definitions for the signals were developed. CQ has its own purpose. I think 
novice contesters should be trying to learn and use q signals commonly heard in 
contests - which are probably just QSL, QRZ, and QSY, as far as I can think of. 
I just learned that QRV or QRZ? (which basically  mean the same thing) should 
be 
used after TU where many of us use QRZ without the ?.
73, 
Bill
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Hi Bill

There are probably others out there like you who don'e know what every Q 
signals is.

I know at times I've sent 'QRZ' when I didn't print someone and didn't get 
any answer back.  Sent a CQ and the guy came right back.  Everyone knows 
what 'CQ' means.  73
Tom W7WHY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>