All Chen would have to do is put the modem into a snap in DLL and it would
work for my radio operations center software. (I do have a soundcard rtty
in it already). Since I have the skeleton source for the snap-in under GNU
and full source for the MT-63 DLL under GNU, it would be very easy for him
to just port the modem parts of his code over to windows, since I already
have the the Windows interface.
Here's the link for the snapin stuff.
http://www.timewave.com/support/SnapIns/
Rick W4PC
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 12:21 PM
To: 'Steve Hunt, W1CDX'; rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Best RTTY program/hardware
> Who Won? Is anybody going to engineer, design and build a
> "new" RTTY Modem for us
>
> This looks like a job for Microham ... Joe?
As mentioned elsewhere, hardware designs are simply too inflexible
and too costly. Anyone can throw together some code for a sound
card and release it for free. Unfortunately, that makes doing a
RTTY modem a losing proposition for a company like microHAM.
To do a top notch job requires someone with a detailed knowledge
of DSP, data coding, modulation and HF propagation characteristics.
Even then it would take many man-months and probably be something
that would be pirated as soon as the first copy was sold.
It is a shame that Chen's code is not available on the Windows
platform ... I'd like to link it to Dave's outstanding logging
software <G>.
> But if Microham would build a Harware RTTY Modem (a good one)
> I would buy it.
Both Chen's cocoaModem and Dave's DXLab Suite run very well with
microHAM's hardware <G>.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Hunt, W1CDX
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 10:11 AM
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: [RTTY] Best RTTY program/hardware
>
>
> very Interesting thread... but it suddenly stopped
>
> Who Won? Is anybody going to engineer, design and build a
> "new" RTTY Modem for us
>
> This looks like a job for Microham ... Joe?
>
> I too am suspect of all the Soundcard decoders, we all use
> ... for not beeing up to par to a good Hardware solution ...
> But Hardware wise ... there is nothing out there.
>
> maybe if I had a good Hardware RTTY decoder, I could save
> myself some time building out my Receive-Antenna, which I
> have to takle this summer and many Q? will follow.
>
> Anyway, nice thoughts and I too will try the EU1 profile that
> Dave uploaded to his DXLabs Site.
>
> But if Microham would build a Harware RTTY Modem (a good one)
> I would buy it.
>
> 73 all
> Steve, W1CDX
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.6/1891 - Release Date: 1/24/2009
8:40 PM
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|