To: | "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question |
From: | Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu> |
Date: | Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:52:05 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
At 11:32 PM 7/24/06, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: >I don't know that power levels are particularly defensible either >but they have been a "fact of life" for at least 40 years. At least 40 years? Perhaps for some modes or in some contests. But for CQWW RTTY as one example, a separate low power category was added in 1993. That seems more like recent memory than a fact of life. 73, Mike K1MK Michael Keane K1MK k1mk@alum.mit.edu _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] The Horse Died !, Bill Turner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Two sides, Bill Turner |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |