| To: | "'Michael Keane K1MK'" <k1mk@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question |
| From: | "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:03:55 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Mike, > At least 40 years? Perhaps for some modes or in some contests. But > for CQWW RTTY as one example, a separate low power category > was added in 1993. Perhaps in CQWW RTTY ... but that contest is also relatively young compared to CQWW CW/SSB, Sweepstakes, ARRL DX, etc. All of those have had separate high/low power categories for as long as I have known. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question, Joe Subich, W4TV |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question, Joe Subich, W4TV |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question, Michael Keane K1MK |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] SO2R vs. SO1R - a pertinent question, Phil Sussman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |