RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse...

To: "Rick Mintz" <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse...
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Reply-to: noway@nohow.com
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:43:13 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:28:19 -0400, you wrote:


>Maybe I have a chemical imbalance, but I am a bit miffed at the NAQP RTTY 
>scores. I looked at the 3830 posted scores that finished above mine in NAQP 
>RTTY and noticed the many SO2R entries. (8 of the top 10 scores were SO2R) (12 
>of the top 20)

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

The horse has been beaten to where even the skeleton is no longer
recognizable.

But what the heck... I'd go a step further. I would like to see
basically only two classes:

1. Limited class: One radio, no spotting, moderate antennas, i.e. the
Old Way.

2. Unlimited class: Anything legal goes.

Those classes define hardware only. Within them you could have single
or multi op and high or low power.

Too logical though, it will never fly. :-)

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>