Rich and everyone:
Let's put it in this way:
1.RTTY RU is a popular RTTY Contest and can get way More participants.
However:
2. The Rules are not clear, they need to be revised.
(I do not want to read "three" sources here and there in order to understand
the Rules.)
3. SO2R and/or SOAB Assisted Category as well as Multy-Two Category must be
added.
4. To extend full 30 hours of operation for Multies-this is obvious.
(This is just some very basic recommendations.)
5. 6. 7. etc...
I am not sure if ARRL is interesting in this extensions/modifications though.
But someone can try to contact them.
For now,
Best wishes and see you all in OK RTTY Tonight.
73's Andrei EW1AR-NC2N
Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca> wrote:
Oh, don't get me wrong, Dennis. I think the rules for multi-ops in the
Roundup are perfectly *fair*, that's not the issue. The point for me is
that they result in a contest that can be *boring* for multi-ops.
Consider this scenario: two of you drive to a distant contest station
location at the height of winter, and when you get there you each only get
12 hours of operation out of 30 (even less if there are three or more of
you). There is almost nothing for you to do the rest of the time; there
isn't even a realistic possibility of a multiplier radio. About the most
you can do is tune across a second band with a receiver and load up the
bandmap with unworked running stations, which seems to be a part-time and
not particularly fulfilling occupation for an experienced operator. Even
the excitement of finding a juicy new multiplier for the main operator is
greatly reduced both by the multiplier rules and by the band-change rule.
As compared with the excitement of a multi-two or multi-multi, or of a
full-time single-op (whether SO1R or SO2R), this seems pretty tame.
If one of you has some other work to do around the station for the weekend,
you would probably have more fun letting one operator do a full-out
single-op while the other one did repair and maintenance work (further
south I would say antenna work, too, but not here in Ontario in January!)
Understand also, I am not complaining, and I don't particularly want a
change. For me, this contest is one of the most attractive on the calendar
as a single-op, but it is just not very interesting to me as a multi-op
opportunity, as compared with, say, the WPX RTTY a month later.
No problem, there are still several interesting ways to view this contest -
as a very good single-op contest, as an opportunity to give new operators a
chance to try RTTY, or just as a shakedown opportunity for new hardware and
software (possibly in the checklog category, which is one way to get around
the single-transmitter and band-change limitations). No rule change necessary.
My real point would be that before *any* contest, you need to read the
rules - all of the rules - carefully, analyze the rules in order to
determine what operating category, style and strategy are best suited to
the contest, and make your plans accordingly. In the case of the Roundup,
if a group of a few RTTY operators is looking for a chance for an all-out
multi-operator entry (an RTTY equivalent of the ARRL International DX
contests), this just plain isn't it. So be it, and vive la difference!
73,
Rich VE3IAY
At 10:46 AM 16/12/2005, morris_karen@bellsouth.net wrote:
>I can understand the comments concerning the band change rules for
>multi-singles. It does prevent the multi from "ping-ponging" on 2 or
>more bands. And I agree that an SO2R can beat the multi scores.
>HOWEVER - ALL multis are subject to the SAME RULES - thus, the
>competition is fair. And whether the single ops score higher than the
>multi-ops is apples to oranges. The multis are trying to beat each
>other.
>
>73,
>Dennis
>K4ZJ
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]
>On Behalf Of Andrei Nevis
>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:15 AM
>To: Richard Ferch; rtty@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU
>
>
>This is all correct, EXCEPT THIS:
> 3.2.2. Stations are allowed only one transmitted signal at any given
>time.. (This is only for Multy Stations.)
> Subparagraph 3.2.2 applies to this:
> 3.2. Multioperator, Single Transmitter:
> So, Single Operators do not have this restrictions, in other words
>Single operator can transmit ANY amount of the signals "at any given
>time.."
> woow
> 73's Andrei EW1AR-NC2N
>
>
>Richard Ferch wrote:
> Under the present rules, regardless of whether you agree with them or
>not,
>there are only two categories:
>
>1. Single operator - only one person, NO relief operators, NO helpers in
>
>the shack, NO helpers via the cluster, NO helpers anywhere. No
>restrictions
>on equipment (one, two or three radios) or band changes, but only one
>transmitted signal at any time. The multiplier rules limit the advantage
>
>that can be obtained from a second radio (no per-band multipliers).
>
>2. Multi-operator, one transmitter - basically the same as single
>operator
>except that you are allowed any number of helpers, inside the shack or
>around the world using the cluster. In order to prevent cheating by
>multi-ops with octopus hardware masquerading as single-ops, the contest
>organizers have imposed a band-change limit on this category.
>
>There is no assisted category (which would permit helpers outside the
>shack, but no helpers inside the shack). Because of the multiplier
>rules,
>packet assistance would not be all that helpful anyway. There is no
>multi-transmitter category (more than one transmitter at the same time).
>
>The band change rule hobbles multi-singles (including assisted
>operators)
>so severely that they cannot compete with single-ops. So basically the
>Roundup is a contest for unassisted single ops, with the multi-one
>category
>thrown in almost as an afterthought.
>
>Those are the rules. Complaining here is unlikely to have any effect. If
>
>you want to operate in some other fashion that doesn't fit the rules,
>your
>log will only be a checklog and you will not be eligible for an award
>from
>the contest sponsors. If you don't like the rules, you can petition the
>contest committee for a change, or you can just wait for a contest whose
>
>rules are more congenial to your particular interests. There are plenty
>-
>AA5AU's contest calendar lists 27 each year, and it's missing the fall
>NCJ
>Sprint, so there are at least 28 - that's more often than one every
>other
>weekend. Some of these are local/regional, some are worldwide; some are
>aimed only at single-ops, some offer several different categories for
>multi-ops; some do not permit packet assistance, some do; some are low
>power only, some permit high power. Take your pick and live with it.
>
>73,
>Rich VE3IAY
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/199 - Release Date:
>13/12/2005
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Yahoo! Shopping
> Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/200 - Release Date: 14/12/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/200 - Release Date: 14/12/2005
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|