Re: [RTTY] Bright Idea #99

[George Johnson <w1zt@comcast.net>]

Jack,
Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes.
All true.  And it would not matter how you originated the frequency shifted 
"carrier".  (AFSK or FSK from the exciter).  Both frequencies are not 
transmitted at the same time...  or at least that is the intended 
modulation scheme.
George .. W1ZT


At 06:29 PM 12/19/2004, Jack West wrote:
> Hi All,
>      I have been reading with interest the comments on using FSK.  I run 
> FSK exclusively
> on my old Kenwood TS-940 and I love it.  I do not own an amplifier but I 
> would like to try
> one.  Myself being an active ham for the past 50 yrs, I have lots of 
> "junk" such that I
> think I could build one.  The comment that you can run a "Class C" 
> non-linear amplifier with
> FSK really caught my eye.   Sure!   Why not?   It would be like a amp for 
> CW.  The efficiency would be up.  There would be less heat to 
> dissapate.  It would not have to be Grounded grid and use the ferite 
> isolated filament windings.   Am I on track or what?
> Comments welcomed...
> de
> Jack / W7LD / "Lucky dog"
>  No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.4 - Release Date: 12/15/04
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty