RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Bright Idea #99

To: "Jack West" <w7ld@olypen.com>, "RTTY GROUP" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Bright Idea #99
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:04:33 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
There are some drawbacks to Class C:

1. If you don't make it GG you will have to neutralize it, a tricky bit of design work.

2. Your transceiver will have way too much drive unless it is QRP only. You will need a *very* fast grid protection circuit.

3. Class C also requires a separate regulated bias supply, whether GG or not.

Three good reasons why GG linear has become the standard for Amateur use, but it would still be a fun project. If you decide to go ahead with it please let us know how it turned out.

--
Bill W6WRT

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack West" <w7ld@olypen.com>
To: "RTTY GROUP" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 3:29 PM
Subject: [RTTY] Bright Idea #99


It would not have to be Grounded grid and use the ferite isolated filament windings. Am I on track or what?



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.2 - Release Date: 12/13/2004

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>