To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics |
From: | Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de> |
Date: | Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:42:56 +0200 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Am 12.08.2015 um 23:58 schrieb Saulius Zalnerauskas: And dont use this stupid @TEST@ after CQ TEST CALL CALL Why "stupid"???If I come to a frequency only hearing tailend "LY5W" I do NOT know whether you are calling CQ or calling another station. When you leave out "test" forcing me to wait whether to call or not you save time at my expense. Could be called stupid, too. Both ways have advantages and disadvantages, but stupid is something different. In RTTY for example it is a well established practice to add "CQ" at the end of your CQ-string after your call. Chris DL8MBS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Verticals on the beach (AGAIN), Ed Sawyer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Verticals on the beach (AGAIN), David Gilbert |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics, Saulius Zalnerauskas |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics, OZ1BII Henning |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |