CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics

To: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics
From: Tiberiu Tebeica <yo9gzu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 02:16:13 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Tim,

Top entrants in EU ask every single caller for QTCs, starting from the very 
first minutes of the contest. No serious competitor seek a good QSO rate in 
this contest. QTC total number is the rule.

The moment when one asks for QTCs and even the running position in the band map 
are important. If you land with your running frequency right next to another 
big gun, which can be a QTC vacuum cleaner, you will get mostly callers without 
QTCs to offer. Because the total number of QTCs is limited, there is a 
continuous competition for them.

S&P mode has to be QTC focused, nod QSO focused. That means, one has to keep a 
close look-out for stations that didn’t send their QTCs yet, even though they 
are already in the log, and sometimes one should speculate the right moment 
when they have a full pack of 10 to send. One second might cost you another 
5-10 minutes of background close monitoring of that particular station, until 
they bring together 10 new QTCs.

Remember, a EU station will always be happy even with a single QTC received. 
The amount of energy and time put in for those QTCs is tremendous.

73 Tibi YO9GZU

On Aug 10, 2015, at 8:05 PM, Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am curious about how the EU stations determine who to ask for QTC's. I'm
> guessing EU's are looking for loud well-keyed stations to ask for QTC's. I
> note that in the 3830 results for WAE CW Monday afternoon, I see a handful
> of EU stations with twice as many QTC's as QSO's, an excellent result
> showing a lot of effort in asking for QTC's.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>