In article <CAGFPXLKLsWFjrZ-Pu3xXyCFwUOjvi1LPYUvtpm6kSCg766dBiA@mail.gmail.com>,
Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com> wrote,
on "Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:51:27 +0300";
> I think such mistakes are more exclusions than a rule... I maintain my view
> that most serious EU participants have good control of from whom to receive
> QTC.
I know only few stations do such. And what I wrote is just to indicate
what was actually happened.
> Imagine if all started using this long message QTC? DE R3/SM6LRR (or
> similar) - and when you have 2-3 stations doing it simultaneously.... The
> delay and loss of RUN rate is inevitable.
I don't mean to generalize the situation, and that's true from your stand
point of view. But, for my situation it should have been less frustrating,
if the stations sent 'QTC' with callsign, since I'm somewhat impatient :-)
even with the situation you mentioned. I may be immature in that sense.
--
Katsuhiro 'Don' Kondou, JH5GHM (JH1GBZ for contesting)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|