| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Jul 2015 13:33:56 -0700 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Thu,7/30/2015 9:56 AM, Ken Widelitz wrote: I've been sending enn for 599 for a long time. No one ever complained. That doesn't mean we like it. Cut numbers beyond 5nn often slow things down, especially as part of an exchange. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ?, Saulius Zalnerauskas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ?, Radio K0HB |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ?, Ken Widelitz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ?, Radio K0HB |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |