CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ?

To: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ?
From: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:18:36 +0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I like "5NN and pse rpt ur call."
I also still hear T6 signals.
Ah, why not just send one dit ?
Charly

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:

> My preference is ENN, 5NN, or SNN in that order. They all easily and
> automagically convert to 599 at my fingertips.
>
> Beyond those, cut numbers in the RST are a distraction to me.
>
> In serial numbers, etc. I like a leading "T" (or "TT") in numbers below
> 100, but no other cut numbers.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
> "Just a boy and his radio"™
> --
> Proud Member of:
> . ARRL - http://www.arrl.org
> . RSGB - http://www.rsgb.org
> . A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
> . Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.org
> . Arizona Outlaws contesters - http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
> . Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
> . Minnesota Amateur Radio Technical Society - http://www.mn-arts.org/
> . Lake Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
> . Royal Naval Amateur Radio Society - http://www.rnars.org.uk/
> . SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
> . CW Operators Club – http://www.cwops.org
> . SKCC - http://www.skccgroup.com/
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
Charly, HS0ZCW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>