Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service

To: r@somis.org, edbriggs@optonline.net
Subject: Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service
From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:19:49 +0000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I did not even know about these.  How much are they?  If they are
designed to connect by wire to a sensor that can be placed in the
rf deck area it might be worth it to have one dedicated to monitoring
the temp.

Rob/K5UJ


From: R. Measures <r@somis.org> To: Ed Briggs <edbriggs@optonline.net> CC: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>, amps@contesting.com Subject: Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:01:07 -0700

- In the 21st century, the best way to determine if seal cooling is adequate is with an IR digital thermometer. If I spring for one, it will be a Fluke. With a name like that, it has to be pretty well engineered.

On Aug 25, 2004, at 4:51 AM, Ed Briggs wrote:

I contacted the manufacturer on a related topic some time back. Their
official response (contained in the manual) is for keydown operation, 650W
max, 50% duty cycle, 10 minutes max transmission time (as you know from the
manual)

I inquired how to derate this for a longer transmission time (say 30
minutes).  I speculated that since when operating bias is applied (no rf
drive) the amp idles at appx 160 ma  yielding a dissipation of 450w,
representing just under 50% of the combined dissipation of the two tubes,
and I asked, is it 'safe' to let the two tubes run with at this level of
dissipation for 30 minutes (the key is up after all).

They responded " In theory 450 watts should be safe for key down operation
but we could not guarantee the tubes would survive this operation."

How does this apply to your AM question.  The manufacturer seems to have
some reservations about cooling at 450w steady state so, although I'm not
sure whether they mean 450 w output or 450 w dissipation (possibly the
same).

Others on this reflector may be able to use this data point from the
manufacturer to predict.

Ed

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:13 AM
Subject: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service


Hi folks,

I am the owner of a 3 year old Ten Tec Centurion amp. This unit employs
two
3-500ZGs on an elevated socket platform in the rear right side of the
cabinet (when facing the front panel).  On the rear left side is the h.v.
power supply with a Dahl model 422 transformer which delivers 3.2 kv
(around
2.9 under load) to the plates. Between the p.s. and rf deck is a rf
shield
running down the middle of the chassis.  A square hole is cut in this
between the tubes and p.s. and over that is mounted a Bi-Sonic tube axial
muffin fan, model 4E-115-S21, sleeve bearing, 115 v. 220 ma 20 w. 2200 RPM
moving 82 CFM.  The fan is on the tube side of the shield, and draws air
in
through the left side of the cabinet, over the p.s. and exhausts it
horizontally over the h.v. plate choke and tubes, including the pins and
anode heat sinks, which are the flat type extending out horizontally.  As
most of you know, this has become the standard cooling method for these
tubes in amateur amps since Heathkit began using it for the SB220.

This cooling is adequate for low duty cycle modes for which the Centurion
was designed, but I would like to use mine for brief transmissions (5 to
10
minutes or less) of dsb carrier AM running a carrier of 200 to 250 watts.
I
have done this for a couple of minutes and the amp gets pretty darn hot.
I
would therefore like to boost cooling so as to avoid seal failure.
Increased noise is not a problem for me.

Bi-Sonic manufactures a fan that is identical to the stock fan but at
higher
rpm, and 20 more ma, 22 w. and 105 CFM, around a 25% improvement over
stock.
Is this an increase worth pursuing? Another possibility would be to add
a
fan to the external surface of the cabinet over the grill on the right
side
of the rf deck to speed up the draw of air to the right, out of the
cabinet.
Again, is this an improvement, and would it be worth pursuing?



Overall, :
A. Are these mods necessary
B. Are there any comments on these methods
C. Perhaps most important, is operating this amp on AM beyond its
efficiency
and heat dissipation design capability and should I keep it for SSB and
CW,
and look for something with higher plate voltage and/or tubes with higher
plate dissipation / more cooling?

Tnx,

Rob Atkinson
K5UJ

p.s. to save you time and trouble, please no comments to run a plate
modulated boat anchor.

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page ? FREE download! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>