Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:patriot121@msn.com: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: your thoughts (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:15:26 -0700
I have slightly over 520' feet of antenna in the air.... its about 100' in the air ... and im feeding it with twinleed, but was thinking that i dont need the feedline.. the wire take off at prox 115D
/archives//html/Topband/2008-04/msg00070.html (6,920 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: QSL AND BROADBAND (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:33:20 -0800
Any one have schematic/values for a AM Brick-Wall Filter?? Or will a open 1/4 pice of coax do ok for high pass ?? KC7NOA _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live
/archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00145.html (7,404 bytes)

3. Topband: FCP Isolation Transformer (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:30:56 -0800
Would stacked MICROMETALS T300-2/97 work? I thought I saw a thread about what would work ... im mobile and haven't found it yet. Mike KC7NOA _______________________________________________ UR RST IS
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00415.html (9,617 bytes)

4. Topband: BAD OT:Phase noise *** RE: digital on 1838 +/- (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 21:08:38 -0800
Don't you mean IMD from the radio/amp driven past ALC? CW is a binary signal and no one complains of its "phase noise" ..... Mike KC7NOA _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ...
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00629.html (9,130 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: More Amplifier info (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 07:46:02 -0700
Im not sure what part this was now ... it seems to be lost to the thread .... Was it the NXP BLF578XR ? if not has the thought of a HF linear droped because of harmonics,,,, ECT,?? Mike KC7NOA ______
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00104.html (10,376 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: The use of digital modes on 160 metres (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:48:11 -0700
Ok ... I call foul k6xt.... Most all digital mode ops are watching the waterfall .... its hard not to miss CW..... Most fair digital ops can recognize a fair number if digital mode by site .... Cw be
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00120.html (11,047 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: TB digital (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 21:19:25 -0700
Can you copy 25 stations that are at noise level at 25 wpm at the same time? All in a 1.4khz spectrum? Fantasy is your part of the wet noodle of an antenna .... Mike KC7NOA Using psk31 ... my compute
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00127.html (10,174 bytes)

8. Topband: OT: 60M/TB digital (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:52:19 -0700
Im not sure if there is a group discussing digital to voice/cw spacing on 60m. Granted you can't do that at all, considering the current plan, but maybe having 2 channels for digital would be better.
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00136.html (11,360 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Remote SDR Receive only setup (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:19:25 -0800
Nothing about the software or most of the hardware .... KC7NOA _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00400.html (11,801 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Remote SDR Receive only setup (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:35:36 -0800
Not there anymore .... " G3XRJ Site Navigation Home Recordings Current Weather Photography Feedback Following files Hosted for ZL3IX - 160m Remote Receiving Array - RX array-Demo audio file .mp3 2 Wi
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00402.html (13,401 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Remote SDR Receive only setup (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:49:55 -0800
Got it .... thanks .... Not to go view it on a real computer ... my dumbass smartphone doesnt like it ... KC7NOA _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00406.html (9,242 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Remote SDR Receive only setup (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:53:08 -0800
Glad to know it was discussed here ... I'm interested in any DIY remote setup ... Using ghpsdr3-alex right now ... KC7NOA _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@c
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00407.html (8,892 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Remote SDR Receive only setup (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:17:22 -0800
Speaking of other people writen software ... is there no viable alternative to Virtual Audio Cable? KC7NOA _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00411.html (13,627 bytes)

14. Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M (score: 1)
Author: Mike <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:47:12 -0800
I have a question .. not top band related ... almost but how often did k1n venture into the general portion of the band on 75m, even on 40m .... I couldn't even make a contact on 20M .... 0UTC and ne
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00517.html (7,762 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M (score: 1)
Author: Mike <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:12:25 -0800
im sure i could of too ... i heard them for hours on 80M (3705 +70Khz) .... some times even 20 over S9 but never ventured above 3800 .... cept once some one got them to go to 60M ... and of corse i d
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00518.html (10,314 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M (score: 1)
Author: Mike <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:44:01 -0800
Larry .. don't jump all over me .... what exatcly was "in my control" of k1n ? -- sure i could risk a fine by calling on 3775 .... I listened almost 10hrs straight (my wife not exactly happy - on sat
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00520.html (10,661 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:47:51 -0700
SPAM !!!!!! _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00130.html (13,968 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:07:39 -0700
If i must .... Tom never mentioned what type of SDR would be wiped out by moderate signals ... That in its self has three problems ... NO filtering? (should this be called -- comparing apples to appl
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00141.html (11,807 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:07:36 -0700
Come on Bill ... did i say you did ? Now, you said that you always read well written info from Tom, I didn't see that structure ... Id like to know what SDR was so poor. SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ... (with
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00144.html (13,983 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 07:12:57 -0700
Quoted your entire email Tom W8JI..... did you say what SDR ...?? I think the problem here is some people read this as a SDR radios never overload, or are superior in every case. Apparently one perso
/archives//html/Topband/2015-10/msg00146.html (12,120 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu