Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:john@bordertech.co.uk: 84 ]

Total 84 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] BARTG contest results (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:52:08 +0100
The results of the 2006 BARTG HF RTTY Contest will be up on the BARTG website in the next few days. If you have any questions or need your busted contact files let me know. See you in the CQWW, John
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-09/msg00040.html (6,854 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Some Advice Needed (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:16:10 -0500
Hi Barry, Good to see you will be back on RTTY. The FL2100Z works fine on RTTY but don't expect it to run flat out for a RTTY contest. I think Yaesu quoted 400W DC input for RTTY so maybe 200-250W ou
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-12/msg00020.html (9,468 bytes)

3. [RTTY] SPE Expert 1K amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:47:54 -0500
Can anyone comment on how good this amplifier is for RTTY contesting? I am thinking of buying a 1K and need to know how much power it will run on RTTY in contest conditions. John GW4SKA _____________
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-12/msg00039.html (6,425 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] N1MM Logger+ RTTY macro question (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:45:34 -0500
Dick, Are you sure you are looking at the run line of the macro? Mine reads: F2 REPORT,{TX}{ENTER}! 599 66 66 {RX} And it does exactly that. New line, sends call etc. John GW4SKA Hi guys, The ARRL RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00025.html (8,661 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 07:15:46 -0500
Yes definitely get rid of 599. Do away with anything that is meaningless and doesn't contribute to contest cross-checking. Until this happens, refuse to log anyone who skips the RST when it is part o
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00054.html (8,336 bytes)

6. [RTTY] BARTG Contests (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:04:08 -0500
There never has been a BARTG 'Spring' HF contest. That's just something very confusing that gets around. It just happens that one contest is in March. The main BARTG contests are: BARTG Sprint (Janua
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00105.html (6,930 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Contests (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:55:39 -0500
Nice to see someone remembers that long ago! And one of them signed by me I tried to remove anything related to 'Spring' and 'Sprint' when I started up the first Sprint, just to avoid confusion. So '
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00110.html (8,841 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:01:23 -0500
Hi Dick, BARTG Sprint Contest 2016 12:00z on Saturday 23rd January to 12:00z on Sunday 24th January. John GW4SKA Does anybody know the times for the BARTG RTTY Sprint this weekend? Their web page lea
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00112.html (8,144 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Simple thing that seemed to improve my S&Ping (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 16:18:14 -0500
If I see the other guy send my call wrong once I don't worry. If he sends it wrong twice, he probably needs to correct it. Not my problem ... but out of courtesy to another contester, who has taken t
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00068.html (12,054 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY question (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:20:12 -0500
Like Phil, I keep all the spots coming up and, if needed, just hover to see which area they came from. Watch them coming in on telnet to see band openings. Most important is to check the callsign and
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00081.html (9,144 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:09:31 -0500
Michael, You would probably be OK running the 100W when S&P as that's low duty cycle. When running it depends on your rate. If you are busy it's not so bad on the radio, but things get hot when you a
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00126.html (10,022 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:52:57 -0500
I suspect they are the ones who send 599-101-102 GW0A. Strong signal, perfect copy, 2 different SNs. John GW4SKA The guys keying into the K3 are slow - especially if they make a mistake on sending th
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00136.html (10,185 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 06:58:49 -0500
Contest supervisors generally don't handle these situations because the log sent in will have the RST 'sent' and received. The way to stop it happening is to ask for the RST to be sent, not just assu
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00252.html (13,321 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 158, Issue 50 (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:44:37 -0500
Worked Steve VK3JA at 09:31 14.02.2016 10M in WPX. He sent serial 506 so was very active in the test. Before that was 14.11.2015 on 40M. John GW4SKA Don, the last time I worked Steve (VK3JA) was 28/1
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00265.html (9,383 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Some basic RTTY radio questions (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 05:16:37 -0500
Very interesting indeed. Some of us have stuck with operating methods that were best practice 30 years ago, forgetting that we are using 21st century decoders. I have been trying different AGC settin
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00027.html (10,587 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:17:43 +0100
That's very odd .. or maybe a typo? They have been running on 21097, not 21079, and working split down, not up, when I have seen them. Well done on making the QSO; I am still camping out! John GW4SKA
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00017.html (10,606 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:36:40 +0100
It's not just USA that is struggling with VK0EK. They have been printable here twice on 15 and once on 40, with huge pile-ups, and soon faded down in the noise. RTTY seems to have been on just the 2
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00030.html (15,882 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this, morning (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 22:59:21 +0100
Too often, RTTY seems to be an afterthought for DXPeditions. Not criticizing this one because I haven't heard them yet, but past operations have had operators who are new to RTTY and obviously inexpe
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00037.html (8,436 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] VK0EK RTTY Update (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:57:31 +0100
Another useful method is to hit the 'print screen' button immediately after the contact, then save the picture. I do this with any contact that needs confirming even if it looks perfect. This way you
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00115.html (13,502 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] FT4JA performance (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:22:32 +0100
Right on the nail. The last multi-mode trip I went on ended up with 35K QSOs, 7K on RTTY. That was with just one RTTY op for much of the time and without any priority on the best bands. Peak rates we
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00132.html (12,929 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu