TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:55:35 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
One of the issues I've had for years with not only certain earlier models from Tentec but with other companies as well. This is the use of the microphone input for other than microphone usage. In many cases, this was the only way to get a digital or data signal into the transmit audio chain. The typical result can be overdrive of the 1st audio stage which is before the gain control circuit. Once this stage is over driven no amount of reducing the audio gain will correct the issue. The 2nd issue is that the level required to operate the audio stages correctly requires the external source to be a very low level which is followed by quite high gain amplification. The result as Gary points out is RF in the audio.

While the Paragon provides an Audio In connector, it is simply another input isolated by a 10K resistor and feeding direct to the microphone input. This is not a true line level input. Correctly there should be some 20 to 30 dB of attenuation located between the Audio In and the actual audio stages. I've found this to be of great benefit hence the driving device is required to produce higher output level, thus the signal on the cable between the driving device and the input to the radio is greater, thus the S/N ratio is improved. Otherwise, one is much less likely to experience RF getting into the audio.

Today's radios that do provide a Line Input are more likely to have a separate audio path structured at the correct level configuration. They are much better suited to handle external devices for digital and data operations.

As to the Paragon, this can be fairly easily accomplished by added two resistors along with using the original 10K resistor. The two added resistors are 10K in series and 680 ohms to ground to form a T network. This will then require the external driving device to deliver much higher signal to the radio and greatly lessen the likelihood of RF issues.

I have a basic philosophy to all of this: If it is a microphone then connect it to the microphone input. If it isn't a microphone then best find some other way to get the required signal into the radio.


73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- From: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Cc: <wd9hdq@arrl.net>
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585


As I recall, it was easy to get RF in the SSB audio if a device like the
PK232 was left plugged in. You may be able to avoid the problem with audio
isolation transformers (or RIGblaster nomic) and clamp-on ferrite beads.

73 ES DX,
Gary -- AB9M

-----Original Message----- From: Tim & Darlene Isom
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 1:28 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585


Anyone out there using the Audio in, Audio out, and PTT on the paragon's
rear
panel hooked to a PK232?
If so, having any issues during normal SSB operation with the audio in plug
remaining plugged in?

Can reply to me directly at wd9hdq@arrl.net

Thanks.

Tim, WD9HDQ
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>