TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Model 963 questions

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Model 963 questions
From: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <Mike_N4NT@charter.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:27:49 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Could be you're right. But those things have been around for a long time and a lot of them left the factory unsuitable for use in an RF environment. If it applies, there it is. If not, no harm, no foul.

Mike N4NT

----- Original Message ----- From: "Richards" <jruing@ameritech.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Model 963 questions


I understood from reading elsewhere that particular problem had been
resolved with a circuit revision.

THANKS for the uptake.

------------------
Happy Trails.
=======================  Richards / K8JHR  =========================

On 9/22/2011 07:23, Mike Hyder -N4NT- wrote:
There have been troubles reported in the past with the Astron RS-35 due to RF energy entering the unit. I do not know if newer models have eliminated
that but here's what they said ten years ago.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>