TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews

from [Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:51:19 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
Simple; those that fuss are not buying on looks...


-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On 
Behalf Of Rodney
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 4:17 PM
To: ac5aa@ac5aa.com; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews

why all the  fuss on the way radios are tested most hams buy radios that 
look good they do not care about spec. w3krq


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Jim Brown
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Phil Sussman
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Rodney
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Jim Brown
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]