| To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews |
| From: | "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:51:19 +0200 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Simple; those that fuss are not buying on looks... -----Original Message----- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rodney Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 4:17 PM To: ac5aa@ac5aa.com; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews why all the fuss on the way radios are tested most hams buy radios that look good they do not care about spec. w3krq _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Phil Sussman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Rodney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Jim Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |