TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews

To: ac5aa@ac5aa.com, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews
From: Ray Sills <raysills@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:12:17 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Duane:

Yes.. another good reason. Of course, there are hams who, for their own reasons, do not wish to be a member. I think that's a shame, but it is -their- choice, and I respect that. I think that articles older than 5 years might be able to be viewed by non-members, but I'm not 100% sure of that.

And most certainly, everything published by the ARRL, be it via paper in QST, or a book, or on line -is- copyrighted. Depending on what you want to do with the material, I think it's possible to get permission to copy it, but you have to contact them for the permission. ALL rights reserved, etc. :)

73 de Ray
K2ULR

On Sep 2, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Duane Calvin wrote:

Just another reason to become a member. I would think that, like QST, the
articles are copyrighted.

        73, Duane


Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
www.ac5aa.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>