To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials. |
From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 08 Jan 2011 12:50:26 +0000 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Ray, If that had happened to me, I would have had little respect for professors who can't resolve such a simple issue! Steve G3TXQ On 07/01/2011 23:53, Rsoifer@aol.com wrote: > When I was an undergraduate at MIT, there was a requirement for a > Bachelor's degree thesis. Mine was about bouncing 2m signals off Echo II > (see my > QST articles about that in 1962). Anyway, they invited three prominent > professors, all of them hams, to be on my thesis committee. They quickly got > into an argument about whether 20 dB (voltage) was the same thing as 10 dB > (power). I just kept my mouth shut, and got an A. True story. > > 73 Ray W2RS > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials., Steve Hunt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials, Steve Hunt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials., Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials., Richards |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |