| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology |
| From: | Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:40:11 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I suppose we could spot Mr. West some slack given the context. He was saying all that as a very generalized statement relative to the exam question pool. I was just trying to apply what I was learning in the book to what was being said here. ================= James - K8JHR ======================== On 1/6/2011 7:03 PM, Stuart Rohre wrote: > I do agree, Gordo should have been more precise, ======================================================= _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Richards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Nathan moreschi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology, Stuart Rohre |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology, Steve Hunt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |