TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins)

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins)
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:09:25 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Rick,

I'll have to review this, maybe I am suffering from a false memory, or an accurate memory of false information. I thought that a poor counterpoise under a vertical reduced the overall efficiency AND had a negative effect on the pattern diminishing the low angle radiation more than the higher angle radiation. N6LF's studies may help clear it up.

The number of radials won't really affect the angle of radiation.
With a poor ground, you will still have a low take-off angle; you'll just
had a heck of a lot of ground losses.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>