| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
| Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:09:25 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi Rick,I'll have to review this, maybe I am suffering from a false memory, or an accurate memory of false information. I thought that a poor counterpoise under a vertical reduced the overall efficiency AND had a negative effect on the pattern diminishing the low angle radiation more than the higher angle radiation. N6LF's studies may help clear it up. The number of radials won't really affect the angle of radiation. With a poor ground, you will still have a low take-off angle; you'll just had a heck of a lot of ground losses. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Richards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Richards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |