TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology
From: "CSM\(r\) Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:08:16 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
During the mid 1970's, U.S. ARMY FIELD MANUAL 24-18, Appendix M and other pubs referenced the Near Vertical Incident System antenna and its development to meet a 0 to 500 mile skip-zone free communications requirement in jungle and mountainous terrain. The antenna height recommended was one-eighth wavelength or less including one tactical antenna system consisting of a pair of 4 MHz and 7 MHz inverted Vee dipoles with common coaxial feed guying a twenty foot pole. NVIS sky-wave path loss for 3-7 MHz should be 110 dB. Back in the mid-1980s I used a NVIS inverted Vee (16 foot pole) all band doublet fed with 450 ohm line for a daily sked over a 110 mile path either on 80 or 40 meters depending on absorption / propagation. Never used more than 100W.


Best regards,

CSM(r) Gary Huber - AB9M
9679 Heron Bay Rd
Bloomington, IL 61705
(309-662-0604)
www.csm-gh.com
glhuber@msn.com
gary.huber@us.army.mil

-----Original Message----- From: Steve Hunt
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 5:03 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology

Jerry,

I seem to recall reading somewhere that the term NVIS dates from the
Vietnam war; I'll see if I can find a reference.

73,
Steve G3TXQ

On 31/12/2010 05:13, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote:
80s sounds like when the name was invented. I recall commenting at a
radio club meeting when the topic of NVIS was announced that we'd been
doing that for eons, so what's new? The name I guess.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>