| To: | geraldj@weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> |
| Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:25:57 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
We used low antennas out of necessity long before the military called them NVIS and on 80 and 40 worked the surrounding states very well for ragchews, nets, and FD.When I was a Novice, my mentors called it "short haul skip." One of those was a former Air Force radio man, and if NVIS had been a common term used by the Air Force, I probably would have heard it from him. I did not hear that term until perhaps the 80s. Maybe it did come from the military. I'm curious about it's origin. Maybe the Army or Navy used it, but I'm pretty sure the Air Force did not use that term back in the 60s or 70s. DE N6KB |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec 1254 ---THANKS, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec 1254 ---THANKS, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |