TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison
From: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:02:40 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jim, even the BMW mechanics can't keep one running without the computerized
test equipment which is beyond their means to buy.



-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of James C. Owen, III
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 6:44 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison

I have a '37 Packard and the only electronics that could fail is the philco 
radio. If we ever have an EMP I will be one of the few that can still drive!
To add a bit to the discussion of obsolete parts, the guru's of the BMW club

keep saying that the only people that should own an out of warranty seven
series 
are BMW mechanics. I think the same can be said of the micro loaded
transceivers 
but even the best technician can't fix these if the parts are not available.
73 Jim K4CGY



----- Original Message ----
From: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 7:03:28 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison

Does anyone have a Lasalle they would trade for a Nissan?

Clayton N3EV



________________________________
From: georgefritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 12:52:49 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison

Gosh I wish I had kept my old Studebaker. 

George, W6GF



________________________________
From: Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net>
To: tentec@contesting.com
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 9:38:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison

> The Corsair II is a fine radio, from what I saw of a friend's one.  It
> might be adequate for all your hamming desires.  However, another issue
> is how much longer will parts be available for it, should something fail?
>I am thinking the same of my various radios, Kenwood 450, and Scout, and
Argonaut V.

I suppose we can find some irony in this.  Transceivers constructed 
pre-digital (displays, control, DSP, etc) likely have better longevity than 
those built afterwards.  New chips are born quickly -- and die quickly.  But

consider any Collins, Hallicrafters, or Drake gear.  With minimal effort, 
one can find replacement parts -- many of which are better than the 
originals.  For example, Sprague Orange Drops or yellow-jacked Polypropylene

in place of black beauty caps.  Also, carbon film resistors in place of 
carbon composition.  So, if I had to keep only one set of equipment working,

I would gravitate toward pre-1980s equipment.

Paul, W9AC 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



      
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



      
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



      
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>