| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 4229 Tuner Balun Replacement? |
| From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:46:24 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
In my experience, all those harmless fractions of a dB have a nasty
habit of getting together and adding up to something more substantial ;)
Steve G3TXQ On 14/11/2010 18:38, Jim Brown wrote: On 11/14/2010 10:15 AM, Don Jones wrote:When this "hair" is measured in dB units instead of linear units the loses become insignificant.I certainly agree with respect to loss, but the linear view is important from a dissipation point of view. I do a lot of measurements, mostly to understand and characterize some physical elements or systems, and I find that log amplitude (that is, dB) and log frequency nearly always provides the most useful view of the data. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 4229 Tuner Balun Replacement?, Steve Hunt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 4229 Tuner Balun Replacement?, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 4229 Tuner Balun Replacement?, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 4229 Tuner Balun Replacement?, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |