TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TenTec Product Status Update

To: TenTec reflector <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Product Status Update
From: art davis <n4uc@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:25:18 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I wondered that myself. I thought contesting WAS casual operating!

N4UC

> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:00:41 -0500
> From: martin.s.ewing@gmail.com
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Product Status Update
> 
> I appreciate the informative email as well.  (Next step - John Henry's very
> own blog site? :-)
> 
> One question on the 565 updates.  I wonder just what updates would be
> optimizations for contesting as against "casual use"?  I wasn't aware of any
> great conflict there!  Anyone have thoughts about this?
> 
> Stability is a goal that everyone can appreciate.
> Maybe a contester doesn't care so much about NR and notch functions.  Or
> getting the audio levels balanced correctly?
> 
> 73
> -- 
> Martin S. Ewing, AA6E
> Member IEEE, URSI, AAS, ARRL
> Branford, Connecticut
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
                                          
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>