TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us...

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us...
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 00:08:44 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Its because if the only tool you have is a hammer, then every problem looks like a nail !!!! LOL

Seriously, labels are a bummer, and this is but one example of the point.

73


----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Hunt" <steve@karinya.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us...


I'll say it again folks: these are misleading labels!

A load of 2+j10 needs the **same** configuration as a load of
1000+j1000: shunt C across the load.
A load of 2+j9 needs the **same** configuration as a load of  49-j1000:
shunt C across the source.

Where's the sense in distinguishing these configurations as "High
Impedance" and "Low Impedance"?

Steve G3TXQ

N4PY2 wrote:
The tentec 538 tuner is a reversible L. That means it has 2 configurations
for the L.  One for high impedance and one for low impedance.


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>