| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] G5RV |
| From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:03:59 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Jerry,Then if those formulas fall down with the particular values I gave, they are approximations. Look at it this way: at HF the losses in feedlines are predominantly I^2R losses - the higher the current the higher the loss per unit length. Picture a line terminated in an impedance higher than its characteristic impedance - for a given power, the current directly at the load will be lower than if it were terminated with Zo; so the I^2R losses will be lower per unit length AT THAT POINT. Now move back a little way along the line from the load. In the unmatched case the current will rise (because of the standing wave) and the I^2R losses will begin to increase, whereas in the match case the current is constant and the losses don't change. At some line length the sum total of the increasing unmatched losses will equal the sum total of the matched losses - for any line shorter than this, the unmatched losses will be less. For any load impedance greater than Zo there will be some short lengths of line over which the total loss is less than it would be in the matched case. Any formula that says otherwise is just an approximation. Steve G3TXQ Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote: The formulae on page 24-9 of the 1994 ARRL Antenna Book would always show a greater loss than the matched loss of the line. Perhaps the chart you are referring to is showing the ADDED loss because of the mismatch?_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] bill orr article, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] G5RV, Steve Hunt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] G5RV, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] G5RV, Steve Hunt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |