TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] G5RV

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] G5RV
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:44:19 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Al,

    You said:

The advantage of a simple dipole, resonant length or not, fed open line is a perfect 1:1 on any frequency on any band and you don't have to use coax anywhere.
This may be true for a few particular frequencies, with each dipole length/feed line impedance/feed line length combination you may try. And you could modify the lengths to make it true on some different frequencies. It is not true that there is a perfect 1:1 SWR "on any frequency on any band" for one dipole wire length and one open wire feed line length combination, even if you mean the SWR the transmitter sees and not the SWR on the line itself.

With a matching network, it can be made to be nearly true, or at least appear to the transmitter to be true, by adjusting the matching network for each frequency, or perhaps bypassing it on those few special frequencies where you don't need it. You'll probably be using coax somewhere, like between the matching network and the transmitter, unless your transmitter has a link coupled output to feed open wire feed line directly.
Huh? A perfect 1:1 what? Not SWR

It wasn't clear but I meant a perfect 1:1 swr looking from the transmitter. Not on the line itself. The line has a high swr on some bands but the loss is minimal compared at any other type of feedline arrangement.

AL

DE N6KB


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>