TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] TenTec 228 ATU

To: Tentec list <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] TenTec 228 ATU
From: Marinus Loewensteijn <zl2ml@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:35:52 +0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Just bought a 228 ATU. Front is immaculate, bottom and top have some scratches 
but a paintjob will take care of that.

The SO239 sockets are well used so those are replaced with N-sockets in line 
with all my other gear. 

When the cover was off it showed that the toroid / switch has the plastic 
melted on one side. Further inspection revealed that the capacitor connections 
were swapped around: the TX is connected to the antenna side and the antenna is 
connected to the TX side. This may have had an influence on not optimal tuning 
practices but more likely it has been used with a badly macthed vertical 
antenna and too much power.

I've been looking for an alternative configuration that will minimize  / avoid 
this problem of high losses in the main inductor. 

What I have discovered sofar is that the greatest losses in a T-match appear 
due to: (too) small variable capacitors combined with low frequencies and low 
impedance.

I intend to use this ATU for coax-coax matching for "tuned" antennas in order 
to get a 1:1 SWR across the band. 

I am considering to use an 1:4 impedance transformation at the output using a 
meaty toroid (T184-2) and have the tuner "see" a nominal 200 Ohm output towards 
the antenna which gets "down transformed" to 50 Ohm for the coax.

Using the ARRL TLW software indicates this should at a minimum half the losses 
in the main inductor while at the same time the capacitor values become well 
within a range of far more practical values. 

I know that there will be additional losses in the impedance transformation 
toroid but that should dissipate without causing damage.

( Since I will be working with matched antenna's I do not expect any great 
reactances or abnormal high impedances on the feeder. The impedance 
transformation toroid "should" therefor run within a reasonable load area and 
"should" not have extreem losses. )

Any feedback on the above proposed change will be greatly appreciated. 

73, Marinus, ZL2ML

_________________________________________________________________
Get inspired - dream, research, plan and book your next holiday online with MSN 
NZ Travel 
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Ftravel%2Emsn%2Eco%2Enz&_t=771497011&_r=MSN_NZ_travel_hmtagline&_m=EXT
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>