TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue
From: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:33:54 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks not what I said.

I was asking what value their closed software adds that would be lost if they opened their software.

Do they have trade secrets in their implementation that add value that they wouldn't want others to see? I don't see it in the feature list but it may be in performance of their code (for example).

Would they benefit is the open-sourced or partially open-sourced their software. What have they too loose? What do their customers have to win? Would it sell more hardware or improve their "intangibles" (like customer satisfaction or customer service or even software quality or time to find and fix bugs). Would it help them in multiple markets by propagating those bug fixes or new features to other markets? Would it help them against (potentially more open) competitors?

It seems to me that TenTec, like Apple, makes its money on selling hardware that happens to run software (so to speak). But perhaps they consider their software a core competency?

Apple uses an interesting approach where some of their software is open-sourced and some of it is proprietary (the software they use to add value).

As others have said for me amateur radio is about experimentation so the ability to experiment with commercial hardware (by say tinkering with the software just I we tinker with the hardware).

I focus on TenTec here but this applies to other companies too: Elecraft, FlexRadio (Windows only ... whats with that?), Icom, Yaesu, Kenwood, etc.

Some may wonder why this discussion is here but for me (and some others) it's an increasingly important consideration when buying amateur radio equipment that is dependent upon it's software? For how long will the company support this hardware and update/bug fix their software? For example, the ethernet connectivity of the O7 raises interesting issues of security that we've already seen the operating system world deal with.

On Jul 24, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Duane Calvin wrote:

Proprietary software is "non-value added?"  I think we need to start
discussions here with definitions.

        73, Duane

Duane Calvin, AC5AA

--
Kevin Purcell
kevinpurcell@pobox.com



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>