TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] [Orion] "Technical Correspondence", August 2007 issue
From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:31:07 +0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Grant,

When did the Technical Correspondence column become a personal outlet for
marketing material??

Any "marketing" was for the Orion. The author went out of his way to praise Ten Tec and the Orion not once, but twice. He wrote that he wants to _own_ an Orion. An excerpt about Ten Tec: "They are a top-notch company and the radio looks to be marvelous. I wish I had one."

I don't care who's right or not (although the distinction drawn between what
is SDR and what isn't is completely falacious),

I'm not sure what you mean. Oh, you mean drawing a distinction between the Orion and a real SDR has no merit?

but this is truly bad form.
Aggregeous.  Is the next step a Ten-Tec rebuttal?

Perhaps the letter could have been in another column or tagged onto the end of a future Product Review section. What is Ten Tec going to rebut? Everything in the letter was truthful unless you don't think Ten Tec is a "top-notch company." Maybe Ten Tec should rebut that part.

I suggest that software authors or hardware developers or others who wish to
take a swipe at someone elses product

You mean like this?-- "I hope to own [an Orion] before too long." Yep, that's a real swipe. I wonder what Frank Brickle, the author of the letter, says when he likes a product. I am outraged that he didn't say he wants to use his Orion for a pillow when he goes to sleep at night.

be compelled to buy "advertising"
space to do so.  I hope we don't see any more of this kind of thing
permitted, from ANY vendor or developer of ANY product.

Frank Brickle took issue with something in the Orion product review pertaining to the way in which the Orion and the Flex Radios were developed. He pointed out that the Ten Tec firmware is not open source, which is true. Is there a problem with amplifying something that is the truth? Over the years I've noticed that all editorial responses that are some variation on, "how dare you publish that" or, "shouldn't have been permitted" have no real basis for objection--the complainant just didn't like what he read and didn't want to see it. If Ten Tec wants to complain, they could try saying that Frank Brickle is a serious threat to national security. That tactic has been working fairly well against the truth in politics for the past six or seven years.

73,

rob / k5uj

_________________________________________________________________
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>