| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews |
| From: | Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:05:58 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Don't discount the possibility that some e-ham posting may be hoaxes.
Happy Halloween!
73,
Bob WB2VUF
Grant Youngman wrote:
It appears that the original post regarding ON4UN's disposition of his Orions has been sent to the bit bucket, along with some others that were posted right after that in response. But for the first time in a long time I bothered to read through the comments overall. Interesting points of view. One guy even thought his Swan 500 was a better radio. Also his Signal One (didn't say WHICH one), was "1000 time [sic] better". He didn't say what that "1000 time" factor referred to, but I do hope he's enjoying that Swan :-) Sometimes you just have to shake your head .... Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, HUGHESRO |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New Email Address, Donald Watters |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Carter, K8VT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Kc9cdt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |