| To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] eHam Reviews |
| From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:04:03 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
It appears that the original post regarding ON4UN's disposition of his Orions has been sent to the bit bucket, along with some others that were posted right after that in response. But for the first time in a long time I bothered to read through the comments overall. Interesting points of view. One guy even thought his Swan 500 was a better radio. Also his Signal One (didn't say WHICH one), was "1000 time [sic] better". He didn't say what that "1000 time" factor referred to, but I do hope he's enjoying that Swan :-) Sometimes you just have to shake your head .... Grant/NQ5T |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion 28 Mhz noise SOLVED, bob finger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] FS: Immacualte, Hardly Used TenTec 238B HF Tuner: $400 shipped, Joe Giacobello |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Orion 28 Mhz noise, bob finger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, ron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |