To: | Ten Tec Mailing List <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] orion 565 v2.056 bandstacking? |
From: | Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:50:23 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Bob, I too wish there was more flexibility when assigning VFO B to the main receiver. For example, I believe the larger display font should be used for whichever VFO is assigned to the main receiver. VFO A is cramped for space with the AF encoders so close by. I can easily deal with all the other ergonomic issues except that one. Since few folks ever comment on this, I must be in the very small minority here. Gary W7TEA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] orion 565 v2.056 bandstacking?, Bob Cunnings |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 45, Issue 63, CATFISHTWO |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] orion 565 v2.056 bandstacking?, Bob Cunnings |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] orion 565 v2.056 bandstacking?, k8vf_mark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |