Thanks for the clarification.
Apparently I know enough to be dangerous ;)
Sinisa Hristov wrote:
> Lin Davis wrote:
>
>
>>Interesting! I wonder if Ten-Tec did this to reduce the DSP workload thus
>>increasing overall performance (i.e.. sweep, and user input response). If I
>>understand correctly, if you cut the bandwidth that a DSP filter must contend
>>with by 2, you cut the "work load" by four;
>
>
> The workload is proportional to filter length (199 taps default),
> and not related directly to the bandwidth.
>
>
>
>>the filter requires half the coefficients
>
>
> The number of coefficients is most dependent on the
> required filter slope, measured in dB/Hz. As the filter
> gets narrower, the tendency is for the number of
> coefficients to grow, with sampling rate unchanged.
>
>
>
>>and since the sampling rate can be cut in half as well, (decimation is the
>>term)
>
>
> My understanding is that Orion uses no BW-dependent decimation.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|