To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 100 Hz DSP CW filter response with Orion I V2.056 |
From: | Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:42:24 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Barry Gross wrote: > do you think the v2 i.f. response is similar to the audio response of v1.373? >From 14 kHz measurements, V1 and V2 IF responses are essentially identical. > In other words, in v2 they added the audio filter as > post-processing to the v1 filter? Exactly. It is easy to verify that with V2 a strong carrier off-tuned to just become inadible is still causing S meter deflection and AGC action (with threshold set appropriately). 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Scout?, David S.McCallum |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Scout?, ron |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 100 Hz DSP CW filter response with Orion I V2.056, Barry Gross |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] OMNI VI vs Jupiter, William Evans |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |