TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] a question:

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] a question:
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:10:25 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
a friend, ham radio op and commercial radio tech, suggested that solid state 
amps are "cleaner" than tube amps. is that "generally" true?


There are several reasons why a tube amplifier is more likely to be 
cleaner than a solid state amplifier. Most tube amplifiers have higher Q 
output matching (pi or pi-L) networks than solid state amplifiers, which 
generally have broadband ferrite core transformers followed by fairly 
wide bandpass filters. So when properly tuned a tube amplifier is likely 
to generate less noise at frequencies far removed from the intended 
signal. Also the ferrite cores in the output coupling transformers and 
bandpass filters in a solid state amplifier can be driven into a 
nonlinear mode. An air core inductor (in most tube amplifier tank 
circuits) will not go nonlinear. In general a solid state amplifier uses 
more transistors to get the same amount of power, than the number of 
tubes used in a tube amplifier. It is easier to keep one or two tubes 
biased properly, than four or eight or more RF power transistors which 
may have have slightly different characteristics. And the required bias 
of transistors is more sensitive to temperature than tube bias is.

Having said all that, a well designed solid state amp should have all 
those possible problems worked out, and be nearly as clean as a tube amp.

DE N6KB



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>