TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] a question:

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] a question:
From: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 12:59:10 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
thank you, i thot that to be the case. jack

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] a question:


> As long as they are operated in their linear bias range, yes.  Otherwise,
> they get real nasty and real fast.  Tube amps have a much softer bias 
> knee.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 1:24 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] a question:
>
>
>>a friend, ham radio op and commercial radio tech, suggested that solid
>>state amps are "cleaner" than tube amps. is that "generally" true?
>> thanks
>> jack
>> ak7o
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>