To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? |
From: | "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net> |
Reply-to: | Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:46:17 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> If you're using the narrow (HC-4) element, a "bad" audio report is > probably accurate regardless of the rig it's attached to! > > 73, Duane And probably exactly what you want to have. The big guns that bust the pile-ups are proud that they sound like Darth Vader on steroids! Ron Castro Chief Technical Officer Results Radio, LLC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Duane A Calvin" <ac5aa@juno.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:34 AM Subject: Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OII TX Audio experiment/findings, Kc9cdt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 2.031 QSK bug - this is not a bug, Ron Castro |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction?, Grant Youngman |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Orion V2.055, bob finger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |