| To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? |
| From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:30:45 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> If you're using the narrow (HC-4) element, a "bad" audio > report is probably accurate regardless of the rig it's attached to! Amen! Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 2.031 QSK bug - this is not a bug, Grant Youngman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] NR and Orion 2.055, J. Crit Harley, MD, C.Ht. |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction?, Duane A Calvin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction?, Ron Castro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |