TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V Audio

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V Audio
From: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:57:01 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Stuart,

I certainly agree with you, all except for the words "optimum" and "proved". I have this vision that the Bell Labs folk who defined those limits were male folk with more grey hair than I have! 300-3000 is perfect for both their transmission and reception, but put a 7 year old granddaughter on the line and you will quickly decide they might have looked a bit wider!

OTOH for us old(ish) mostly male hams (who aren't allowed to play the flute on the air, anyhow) it is perfect!

73, Joel, W1ZR

Stuart Rohre wrote:

Look at any good audio or radio handbook and you will see that for maximum intelligibility on the radio, you DO NOT want response below 350 Hz. That detracts from hearing the maximum clarity of signal and as someone said simply wastes power.

Speech response for optimum communication extends from 300 to 3kHz. Western Electric and Bell Labs proved this decades ago, and it is still the better way to set up a radio for audio response for ham communications. Remember, hams are to use the minimum power and bandwidth needed for a given mode, NOT have "high fidelity".

Stuart
K5KVH


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>