Well, I just got an Omni V, 705 mic, and 761 pwr
supply. It came in Ten Tec Box with all the padding,
indistinguishable from a new radio. In the flush of
the moment, and experiencing my first dose of Ten Tec
fever, I bought a couple of Inrad 2.8 khz filters
before even seeing/listening to the new Omni. I did
this because I had read somewhere, that it really
makes a worthwhile difference on the Omni V. When I
got the Omni, it did so much more, and sounded so much
better than I expected for my money, that I'm thinking
it's fine just the way it is! The radio came with
slots full except one: The CW narrow. I ordered an
Inrad 600hz to fill the final slot on New Years day,
during Inrads New Year day sale, for $60. My prime
interest is CW. But when Band conditions are good I do
enjoy short Phone DX contacts. So if it would make my
signal easier to copy in weak conditions, it's
probally worth it to me. Right now everyone reports my
audio as sounding great. It's my only radio, so it
needs to fantastic on CW (no problem there!) and
pretty darn good on SSB. If anyone needs the pair of
2.4 khz SSB Ten Tec filters, or would like the Inrad
2.8 khz SSB set for the bodacious fullest audio, let
me know, I could go either way at this point. I have a
shure 444, and I'll try that tip. Randy KE7DFP
--- Mike Brown <k9mi@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Tough question Randy. I guess it comes down to your
> use. Most of my use was
> contesting, so the headset was pretty much a
> necessity to have both hands
> free for the keyboard. I ran stock ssb filters with
> my V, but I can see
> where the Inrad filters would probably be a plus for
> ragchewing. FWIW, the
> locals thought I sounded more "like myself" with the
> Omni V then the Omni
> VI. Nothing wrong with the 705. For the price they
> are hard to beat. And if
> most of your operating is ragchewing, I'd say the
> 705 is a good choice.
>
> 73, Mike K9MI
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Randy Russe3ll" <lord_russell53@yahoo.com>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
> <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 04:59
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Heil Pro-Set to Omni V
>
>
> > Do you think the heil mc-5 works better than the
> stock
> > (705) mike? Also, has anyone tried, or does anyone
> > know about, switching the (two) stock 2.4 filters
> for
> > inrad 2.8 hz filters, to improve SSB audio on the
> Omni
> > V?
> >
> > --- Mike Brown <k9mi@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> >> No problem at all with my Omni V and the Heil
> >> headset using the HC5
> >> cartridge. If you think you need a little more
> >> punch, turn on the speech
> >> processor.
> >>
> >> 73, Mike K9MI
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>
> >> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
> >> <tentec@contesting.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 14:16
> >> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Heil Pro-Set to Omni V
> >>
> >>
> >> > Nah..just get the correct colored adapter
> labelled
> >> "Ten Tec" or make one.
> >> > ....Dave
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Tom Keil" <nn5a@bellsouth.net>
> >> > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> >> > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 10:38 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Heil Pro-Set to Omni V
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I would like to use a Heil Pro-Set with HC-5
> with
> >> an Omni V for
> >> > contesting.
> >> >
> >> > I have been told that the Pro-Set will require
> a
> >> pre-amp to increase the
> >> > mike audio....
> >> >
> >> > Is this true??
> >> >
> >> > Any help or suggestions are greatly
> >> appreciated!!!!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Tom NN5A
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206
> -
> >> Release Date: 12/16/2005
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> _______________________________________________
> >> >> TenTec mailing list
> >> >> TenTec@contesting.com
> >> >>
> >>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > TenTec mailing list
> >> > TenTec@contesting.com
> >> >
> >>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> TenTec mailing list
> >> TenTec@contesting.com
> >>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> >
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|