Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar

[Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>]

I worked for GE and worked on the GE system that did this.  That's all I can 
or will say about it.
73
Bob, K4TAX

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar


> The Soviets were not the only ones using OTHR that utilized HF (some in 
> ham
> bands).  GE did testing that encroached on the ham bands (at times).  I am
> saying that as I saw documentation that indicated this.  I have not
> personally heard any interference that I could positively say was OTHR in
> the last 15 years.
>
> de wd4air
>
>
> > From: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
> > Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> > To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar
> > Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:05:38 -0500
> >
> > GARY HUBER wrote:
> >
> > >When the Soviets were running OTHR in the amateur bands, (which used the
> > HF echo to "see" targets) I used QSK CW dits to synchronize with their 
> > OTHR
> > pulse timing and jam their "B" scopes. As a former Radar Electronics
> > Counter-Measures and Electronics Counter-Counter-Measures operator, I knew
> > it was simply a matter of transmitting a signal of about the same
> > frequency, duration, and slightly stronger than their "return" to confuse
> > their operators.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I guess we should all be thankful that they didn't confuse your Omni D
> > for a swarm of U.S. ICBMs coming over the horizon...  ;-)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec