| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 1254 Q-Multiplier... Yes. Add a signal strenght metertoo and replace those 1N4148s in the 2nd Mixer! |
| From: | jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:13:56 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Lew wrote: Bob... I have the '64 handbook; pp.140-141 (A Transistorized Q Multiplier). If there is interest I will make the article available.Great q multiplier circuit on the HBR site. In fact, the HBR site is absolutely facinating. http://www.qsl.net/k5bcq/HBR/hbr.htm-------Original Message------- From: Bwana BobDate: 12/28/05 20:01:35 To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment Cc: kg6tt@arrl.net Subject: Re: [TenTec] 1254 Q-Multiplier... Yes. Add a signal strenght metertoo and replace those 1N4148s in the 2nd Mixer!That's exactly what I was doing today: looking at the QF-1 schematic tosee if it could be done with FET's. That Q-multiplier from the 1958 Handbook sounds like the same one that I built from the 1964 Handbook. I don't have the schematic anymore, but I still have the parts in the junk box. Anybody have a 1958 or 1964 Handbook?73, Bob WB2VUF Best, jerome - va7vv |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TDE Headphones..., David S.McCallum |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Fear and trembling over headphones, OTAKEBI |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 1254 Q-Multiplier... Yes. Add a signal strenght metertoo and replace those 1N4148s in the 2nd Mixer!, Lew |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 1254 Q-Multiplier... Yes. Add a signal strenght metertooand replace those 1N4148s in the 2nd Mixer!, ve1bn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |