TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Only on the TT reflector

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Only on the TT reflector
From: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:38:29 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I guess I was too critical , sometimes I get on the computer before having
my cup of Joe
!   John kb2huk
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Only on the TT reflector


>
> >  >But is it "worth" the $ 4K with the funky audio with an edge ?
> >
> > One casual "out of the box" comment about the audio, and here
> > we go....
>
>
> Exactly right.  That's all it was when I made the comment, about one
> specific situation.  One observation, after having the radio out of the
> carton for about an hour checking some of the things that were troublesome
> in the original Orion when it was first delivered (I got that radio out of
> the first batch shipped also).  It was not a generic comment on Orion-II
> audio, which is superb.
>
> It was just a comment on something I observed in my brief cruising around
> modes and features, and menu items, comparing to my recollection of the
> Orion, whatever.  Certainly nothing that should start the "is it worth
> $4000" threads.  At least not until there's more than one data point, and
> unlikely then either.
>
> I suppose the best thing to do is to send any observed problems direct to
> ditsnbits, and just "smile" on the list?  :-)
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>