TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TT problems

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT problems
From: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 01:32:30 +0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes Jim, I must agree, but the problem is not in the choices, but everybody has become use to the way the Jap rigs operate and sound and they think that is the way it should be. Over time some will come to believe as we do.

We just have to put up with a ton of complaining first.


73 kc4atu


From: "Jim G" <longpond@downeast.net>
Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] TT problems
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 20:54:18 -0400

>From all the many listings of late concerning various operators ideas on audio ETC, it would seem to be that the only mistake Ten Tec made was to give the operators too many choices on how to tailor signals to what they like. After running the KenWoods, Drake, Collins and !000D, my staion now consists of the Paragon and Titan and the back-up Corsair II and Alpha 78 and I am totally satisfied with receive and transmit signals. This is one operator that is completely satisfied with Ten Tec. Jim K1QCF
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_________________________________________________________________
Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>